How do I politely say "thanks, but no thanks" when someone messages me from an online dating site? I've recently joined okcupid, mostly to.
Table of contents
- Add Comment
- Thanks, But No Thanks, The Kinder Way to Turn Down a Date
- Thanks, But No Thanks, The Kinder Way to Turn Down a Date | HuffPost UK
- How to Politely Decline a Date via Text
I've recently joined okcupid, mostly to meet new people, and so far have had some really nice conversations. However, I've also had some people contact me that I don't seem to have anything in common with. I don't want to just delete their messages - that seems rude, when they've gone out on a limb to message me. But what's a polite way to say I don't see anything to talk about, without that turning into its own conversation? When I was the recipient of "Thanks but I'm sorry, I'm involved with someone right now.
Just say thanks but no thanks, and then block-em. They may be going out on a limb, but in my experience, ignoring messages from people you're totally uninterested in is absolutely standard practice. It's happened to me plenty of times, and I don't take any offense. If you're not interested, don't respond.
That's how it goes. I think it's fine to just not reply.
- dating website email tips?
- dating college guys while in high school.
- list of dating shows 2016;
- ivf dating calculator.
- interesting questions to ask on dating sites?
- kpop dating sites.
- Want to add to the discussion?;
It happened to me a few times when I was doing this and I was never bothered by it. Nobody ever sent me a message just to say "no thanks". Are you female, being messaged by men? Most men on online dating sites will continue to pursue you until you block them or tell them to fuck off. Give me a try. I know you'll like me. I think it's ok to not respond. That's one of the upsides to online dating, when someone sends that first message, there's no real loss in not getting a message back. There's no rejection in the traditional sense. Personally, I'd rather just not hear back, where I ccould assume that they just weren't interested, rather than dealing with a rejection message, however polite it might be.
Happens to me on okc. If someone doesn't respond I take that as a clear sign of disinterest. Nthing the ignore - it's standard practice, and anyone who's going to be really offended or upset by it is really not someone you want to be conversing with. Ignore, it's much less painful that the alternative. If someone told me 'no, thanks' I'd be pretty upset and it would be quite crushing to my ego. But if the mail goes ignored, it kind of tapers off as you lose hope, and after a few days you don't even remember.
I usually ignored most emails I was on okc too, where I found my beloved Mr. X - but occasionally, if they sent a thoughtful and well-written initial message, I'd respond with a "I just started seeing someone, but thanks, and good luck! I used to respond to people to say no thanks in an effort to be polite and there were some guys who would just not let it go and keep emailing me. Then I would feel extra rude because I had already responded to them nicely once and therefore felt obligated to continue. As difficult as it was for me I had to establish a firm "no-reply" policy to ones I wasn't interested in.
I'm in the minority here. When I was single I was on several dating sites, and it would never fail to irritate me when women would simply ignore an email.
A wink or something, sure, okay -- no problem. But if I have taken the time to write a two or three paragraph email, a simple response such as "No, thanks, I don't think we're suited for each other" is a polite way to reply. To ignore a custom-written email is quite rude, in my book. But not all of us are idiots, you know. There's generally two types, those who send out a bunch of generic messages to many people, hoping for a bite. And then there's those that actually read your profile and are genuinely interested, and would probably include some info on common interests or something. The latter should at least deserve a 'thanks, but I'm not interested'.
The former, just ignore. Thank god, someone with a heart. It is unbearably rude to just ignore messages.
Someone is, indeed, going out on a limb. The least you can do is say "Thank you, but I'm not interested'. Give them one chance to do the "Aww but I'm so awesome you'll love me" shtick, say "No thank you" again, and block them. Really, I don't understand how people think it's okay to just ignore other people when they're putting themselves out there.
To me, writing someone back to tell them "Thanks, but no thanks" is like waving over a bum on the side of the freeway to tell him you're not going to give him money. To me, it's rude to write back. For like 3 milliseconds, you get my hopes up when I see that someone has written me back, and then I open up the letter to find out you wrote me to tell me the exact same thing that I could have figured out if you hadn't written at all.
As you can see, people are pretty evenly split between "not replying is unspeakably rude" and "replying just to say no is a terrible insult. The only solution, then, is to do what makes you happy. Do you feel worse when you delete an email without replying, or when you reply and then occasionally get a response of the "but why not?
Do whichever makes you less fed up with the process. Or, do unto others as you would like them to do unto you, knowing full well that some of them would actually prefer the opposite done unto them. But understand that whatever you choose, you won't be able to make everyone happy, and you'll just have to live with that. Personally, I would prefer to receive a "no thanks" e-mail in this situation, especially if it looks like I put some effort into the e-mail.
I can understand your hesitation to ignore someone, especially since in real life this would be completely rude and unacceptable. I know it may feel crummy, but not responding really is the best option. That way, like 23skidoo said, you'll be able to avoid continued attention from people you don't want to associate with. If they can't handle an un-returned message, that speaks to something within them that is off.
- best hiv dating site.
- Welcome to Reddit,.
- speed dating à gatineau.
- free sample online dating profile.
There are an infinite number of reasons why you wouldn't reply; if they're healthy then they'll accept that as part of the process. It takes a lot of courage just to put up a profile, so good luck and I hope you find someone special! I also initially felt it was rude not to respond to everyone, so I would write back and say, "Thanks, but no thanks" to my unwanted gentlemen internet callers. What I got back were some really crazed responses.
One guy wrote me back after the "no thanks" and told me, and I quote, I was "the nail in the coffin" for him, that women were bitches, that my not accepting his offer to communicate was just the last straw for him, and he was ending his online dating membership because of me.
- slow dating in reading.
- writing a great online dating email.
- hook up w hoes skit.
- we are dating but does he like me.
- free dating in holland!
Sheesh, how'd I let that charmer go?! Several others wrote back similar insulting things which led to my deciding that ignoring the emails was the best option. This is contrary to my normal approach to life, but so it is. From the guy's perspective, I've had two guy friends tell me they would get their hopes up when they saw their mailboxes full, only to be disappointed when they discovered it was full of "thanks, but no thanks" responses as 23skidoo said. I found a balanced approach worked best for me: However, if it was clearly a "form letter" seeking my attention and most of them were , I'd not respond at all.
It's not rude to simply not respond. It's not even rude's second cousin. Not responding is so unrelated to rude that they don't even have the same number of chromosomes, legs or eyes. If you're not interested, you don't really want them to show up in your searches, so add them to your 'dead to me' list, too. The other day, someone QuickMatched me. Thing is, this caginess doesn't work; in my "who's viewed you" list it tells me when people have looked at my ad. I'm not an idiot. So I saw that I'd been matched.
Looked at the profile, saw that we had a few things in common, but, frankly, I didn't find her physically attractive in the least, I found some of her hobbies laughable and worthy of derision, and she's married and poly; I am not poly-friendly. I sent her a note saying that I wasn't interested in my usual comic easy-letdown style.
Thanks, But No Thanks, The Kinder Way to Turn Down a Date
Not responding is so unrelated to rude that they don't even have the same number of chromosomes, legs or eyes. If you're not interested, you don't really want them to show up in your searches, so add them to your 'dead to me' list, too. The other day, someone QuickMatched me. Thing is, this caginess doesn't work; in my "who's viewed you" list it tells me when people have looked at my ad.
I'm not an idiot. So I saw that I'd been matched. Looked at the profile, saw that we had a few things in common, but, frankly, I didn't find her physically attractive in the least, I found some of her hobbies laughable and worthy of derision, and she's married and poly; I am not poly-friendly. I sent her a note saying that I wasn't interested in my usual comic easy-letdown style. But a couple of hours later I considered: She responded to my note, but I elected to delete it unread and block her.
Thanks, But No Thanks, The Kinder Way to Turn Down a Date | HuffPost UK
I was probably just feeling extra chatty. But the conclusion remains: I shouldn't have sent her a note. I dunno -- I did the online dating thing for a while, and I always made a point of responding to anyone that had even made a token effort to read, pay attention to, and seem open to discussing stuff in my profile. There's a world of difference between "Hi, I saw on your profile that you're reading A Suitable Boy -- I read it last year and thought it was great, but didn't really care for the ending.
How far along are you in it? You seem pretty cool -- if you'd like to talk books sometime, message me back! LOL rite me back K" as in the first, I'd think, merits a "thanks, but I'm not really interested" and the second no reply. I have been on the sending side of personalized messages on OKC quite a few times. Getting no response to such messages is a common occurrence and it's totally acceptable. My current girlfriend who I met on OKC would always send polite rejections to guys who she wasn't interested in.
She eventually decided to delete her account because she couldn't deal with all of the messages that she felt an imperative to respond to. Given the trade off between getting courteous rejection messages and having more women on the site, I'd would pick the latter without a doubt. When people send the first message, they know they might not get a response. It's not a big deal. If it seems like the fellow in question actually took the time to compose a thoughtful email based on what he read in your profile, the nice thing to do is to send back a polite message telling him you're not interested.
If you get a message from a guy that just says "Hey what's up? I did the online dating thing for a little while as well, and a non-response is completely the norm. That's just the way it is. It's not rude at all. Don't respond to someone unless you're interested. I think it's immensely rude to ignore messages that have been custom-fashioned to attract your attention. If I find a person on OKC interesting, I spend 20 minutes studying her profile and making comments and followup questions.
It's OK not to be impressed, but I would appreciate 15 seconds of your time to know that you're not interested. Even with a form letter. Of course, those who don't put effort in shouldn't get it back. It's just a social norm I disagree with. Unless that occasional profile comes along that looks like a match made in heaven, in which case I bash my head in wondering what she didn't like about me.
Someone responded that recipients don't owe me anything. To an extent, this is true. But think of it in a more tangible context. Say a stranger walks up to me and asks what book I'm reading. I could keep reading like a deaf-mute and pretend he's not there, because, hey, I don't owe him anything. It is safe to ignore the generic messages that don't mention anything in your profile, since they are more or less spam. Do a couple sentences about the weather, or that crazy water-skiing squirrel you saw on the YouTube. Maybe I haven't run into many desperate men, but the conversation has always died fairly quickly after that.
This method requires effort, assumes you aren't getting 20 messages a day, and carries a very small risk of ending up on a date with Ralph Wiggum. I hate to be rude too, but let's face it: Even the ones who can write a nice personal e-mail on round one may go mouth-foamy on you if you send a polite decline. Being polite to everyone is not worth the amount of shit that a chick on the Internet is going to get for saying no directly. In fact, the person interrupting somebody reading the book is being rude. I know it's off topic, but I find nothing more rude than some stranger coming up to me while I'm reading trying to start a conversation just because I happen to have a book in my hand.
A book says "I'm more interested in this book than talking to people" not "hey come hit on me" posted by dipolemoment at 2: I agree with this completely. And, guys, you have to understand that women on these sites get entirely different attention than you do. Different in quantity and content. I think that if you receive an earnest email meaning one that is not just some general message that the person sends out to everyone it's your moral obligation to respond. It's not easy to do if you have at least an ounce of compassion, but use that compassion to force yourself to respond.
How to Politely Decline a Date via Text
I think that most people perfer to know even if it's bad news. I know that I, as a woman, hate when people don't reply to my emails. Sometimes they answer my questions but clearly don't say anything else that would further the conversation, and that is my cue to bow out with a "thanks for the info".
I usually just thank them, say that I'm not interested and good luck. Saying you're not interested can be specific but don't get into specifics if you think it may be hurtful. And try not to lie; better to keep it vague and simple than get caught up in big lies. Good luck with dating! No one ever writes back to me and I like it that way! Yeah, I also went the ignore-route when I received a message from a man on OKC that was obviously not a good match for me. It really did seem par the course. A few times I received messages that a lot of work and thought had gone into, from people who lived far enough away from me that even if I had interest I probably would not have attempted to take things further.
I would rather be ignored, in other words, than get a personal "not interested. And that way they won't be too discouraged to write that next message, that MIGHT garner them a positive response. Being ignored means that the person in question couldn't even be bothered to take ten seconds out of their oh-so-busy day to show some simple courtesy.
Personally, I'd rather hear "Hey thanks, but no thanks" than a blank wall of silence; the latter is soul-crushing. Not everyone has the same definition of 'courtesy'.
What is discourteous and soul-crushing to you is courteous and a non-issue to others. Most others, it seems. Artfully ignoring the carefully worded, charming little message I was inspired to fire off to you after reading your profile is indeed rude. But that is OK by me because it helps me filter out you without the expensive business of shouting matches, divorce lawyers and broken rattles all round. The most polite thing to do is to ignore his message. Then there's at least some chance he'll feel no rejection at all because he'll forget the whole thing.
I got an e-mail from girlithoughtwashot37! I don't mind when I don't receive a reply, and it doesn't even feel like rejection because I will never know for sure why they didn't reply. I receive many messages from people who I might actually be interested in, but then I often just don't get round to replying.